Violence in the Name of God

CC Torah e1401013851211

Religiously inspired violence has returned to haunt the world. Hostage-taking and hostage-killing, suicide bombings and massacres like the slaughter of schoolchildren in Beslan have become the face of terror in our age. Much has been spoken about weapons of mass destruction. Yet Beslan was achieved by nothing more sophisticated than rifles and explosives. 9/11 was committed using box cutters and planes, not normally regarded as weapons at all. All along, we were looking in the wrong direction: at means instead of motives. The greatest weapon of mass destruction is the human heart.

The most eloquent words about our time are those at the end of today’s sedra. Having created a universe of order, God saw human beings, his most precious creation, reduce it to chaos. The Torah then says: “God regretted that He had made man on earth and He was grieved to His very core.” That is the ultimate refutation of those who claim that, in murdering the innocent, they are acting in the name of God.

The connection between religion and violence is set out at the beginning of the biblical story of mankind. The first two human children, Cain and Abel, bring an offering. Abel’s is accepted, Cain’s is not. The first recorded act of worship leads to the first murder, the first fratricide. Religion, the Torah implies, is anything but safe. At its best it lifts human beings to become “little lower than the angels.” At its worst it leads them to become the most destructive form of life on earth.

What is the connection between religion and violence? There have been three major theories in the past hundred years. The first was Freud’s. Freud believed that social pathology replicated the psychology of the individual, specifically the Oedipus complex. In ancient times, the children of the tribe, envious of the power of the tribal chief, murdered him. They were then haunted by guilt – what Freud called “the return of the repressed.” The ghost of the victim became, as it were, the voice of God.

Rene Girard argued that religion was born in the attempt to deflect violence away from the group by turning it on an outsider. Social groups, especially those not ruled by law, are riven by vendettas. X kills Y. A member of Y’s family kills X in revenge. X’s family returns the violence. The feud continues, and the only way of ending it is to deflect it onto someone outside the group. Righteous anger is purged and order restored. For Girard, the primal religious act is human sacrifice. Its object is the scapegoat.

Postmodernists go further. They argue that the very act of self-definition involves the creation of an “other.” For there to be an “us” there must be a “them,” the people not like us. Humanity is divided into friends and strangers, brothers and others. The people not like us become the screen onto which we project our fears. They are seen as threatening, hostile, demonic. Identity involves exclusion which leads to violence.

The Torah’s account is simpler and more profound. Reading the story of Cain and Abel, we ask ourselves: Why did God accept Abel’s offering but not Cain’s? Was not that very act the cause of violence in the first place?
However, the reason God rejected Cain’s offering becomes clear in the words stated immediately after: “Cain became very angry and depressed.” Imagine the following: you offer someone a gift. Politely, they refuse it. How do you respond? There are two possibilities. You can ask yourself, “What did I do wrong?” or you can be angry with the intended recipient. If you respond in the first way, you were genuinely trying to please the other person. If the second, it becomes retrospectively clear that your concern was not with the other but with yourself.
You were trying to assert your own dominance by putting the other in your debt: the so-called “gift relationship.”

Even among primates, the alpha male exercises power by distributing food, giving gifts. When the refusal of a gift leads to anger, it shows that the initial act was not altruism but a form of egoism. I give, therefore I rule.

That is what sacrifices were in the pagan world: attempts to appease, placate or bribe the Gods, thereby coercing or manipulating them into doing my will – sending rain, or victory in battle, or restoring past imperial glories. This is the exact opposite of what the Torah sees as true faith: humility in the face of
God, respect for the integrity of creation, and reverence for human life, the only thing that bears the image of God.

There is no way of telling the difference externally. There can be two offerings – Cain’s and Abel’s – that look alike. They are both acts of worship, both superficially the same, yet between them there is all the difference in the world. One is an act of self-effacement in the presence of the creator. The other is a Nietzschean will to power. How do you tell the difference? By the presence of anger when things don’t turn out as you wished.

The story of Cain and Abel is the most profound commentary I know on the connection between religion and violence. Violence is the attempt to impose your will by force. There are only two ways of living with the guilt this involves: either, like Nietzsche, by denying God, or, like Cain, by telling yourself that you are doing God’s will. Both end in tragedy. The only alternative – the Bible’s alternative – is to see human life as sacred. That remains humanity’s last and only hope

Wohl Legacy; Empowering Communities, Transforming Lives
With thanks to the Wohl Legacy for their generous sponsorship of Covenant & Conversation.
Maurice was a visionary philanthropist. Vivienne was a woman of the deepest humility.
Together, they were a unique partnership of dedication and grace, for whom living was giving.

More on Bereishit

The God of Creation and the Land of Israel

There are times when an ancient text seems to speak more directly to where we are now than to the time when it was first…

The Art of Listening

What exactly was the first sin? What was the Tree of Knowledge of Good and Evil? Is this kind of knowledge a bad thing, such…

The Genesis of Justice

There are words that change the world, none more so than two sentences that appear in the first chapter of the Torah: Then God said,…

Taking Responsibility

If leadership is the solution, what is the problem? On this, the Torah could not be more specific. The problem is a failure of responsibility.…

The Genesis of Love

In The Lonely Man of Faith, Rabbi Soloveitchik drew our attention to the fact that  Bereishit contains two separate accounts of creation. The first is…

The Three Stages of Creation

“And God said, let there be... And there was... and God saw that it was good.” Thus unfolds the most revolutionary as well as the…

The Faith of God

In stately prose the Torah in its opening chapter describes the unfolding of the universe, the effortless creation of a single creative Force. Repeatedly we…

Why Were We Created?

There is a deep question at the heart of Jewish faith, and it is very rarely asked. As the Torah opens we see God creating…

A Living Book

It is the most famous, majestic and influential opening of any book in literature: “In the beginning, God created the heavens and the earth.” What…

The Garments of Light

The context is one of the best known stories of the bible. Together in the Garden of Eden, surrounded by the rich panoply of creation,…